Fibrosis-Inflammation Lab
⌘K
Fibrosis-Inflammation Lab

Accelerating fibrosis and inflammation research through validated preclinical models and expert insights.

Research

  • Models
  • Drugs
  • Insights
  • Resources
  • Pathways

Company

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 Fibrosis-Inflammation Lab. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. MASLD vs MAFLD vs NASH/MASH: Nomenclature & Criteria Guide
Article
Published: 2026-05-03Updated: 2026-05-03
11 min read

MASLD vs MAFLD vs NASH/MASH: Nomenclature & Criteria Guide

NAFLD to MASLD, NASH to MASH under 2023 Delphi with cardiometabolic criteria. MAFLD (2020 Eslam) stays separate. 4 frameworks and MetALD compared.

By Fibrosis-Inflammation Lab Editorial Team
Share:LinkedInX
Table of Contents
  • Introduction: The Naming Problem in the MASH Era
  • 1. Why the Nomenclature Overhaul Was Needed
  • 1.1 Three Motivations for Renaming
  • 1.2 Timeline
  • 2. NAFLD / NASH (legacy 1980–2023)
  • 2.1 NAFLD as Exclusion Diagnosis
  • 2.2 Operational Limitations
  • 2.3 Mapping Legacy Literature
  • 3. MAFLD (2020 Eslam Consensus)
  • 3.1 Positive Criteria Design
  • 3.2 Decisive Differences from NAFLD
  • 3.3 Adoption and Controversy
  • 4. MASLD / MASH (2023 Delphi Consensus)
  • 4.1 MASLD Diagnostic Criteria
  • 4.2 Cardiometabolic Criteria (Adult Version, 5 Items)
  • 4.3 MASH (Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis)
  • 4.4 Practical Differences from Legacy NAFLD
  • 5. MetALD: MASLD + Moderate Alcohol
  • 5.1 Why the New Category
  • 5.2 Alcohol Thresholds (2023 Delphi)
  • 5.3 Boundary with ALD
  • 5.4 Divergence from DSM-5 and WHO Drinking Criteria
  • 6. Four-Framework Quick Reference
  • 7. Impact on Drug Development, Clinical Trials, and Regulation
  • 7.1 Resmetirom Approval as the Watershed
  • 7.2 Bridging Ongoing Phase 3 Trials
  • 7.3 Preclinical Model Label Mapping
  • 7.4 Continuity of Biomarker Frameworks
  • 8. Literature Search and Database Practical Tips
  • 8.1 PubMed
  • 8.2 ClinicalTrials.gov
  • 8.3 Internal Reviews and Protocol Drafting
  • Summary
  • Related Articles
  • References

Introduction: The Naming Problem in the MASH Era

Think NASH just got renamed MASH? The 2023 Delphi consensus1 did far more than rebrand — it redefined the diagnostic criteria. The legacy NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) used an exclusion-based ("not alcohol, not X") definition, whereas MASLD requires at least one positive cardiometabolic criterion.

Adding to the complexity, Eslam et al. proposed MAFLD in 20202 — a separate framework with different endorsing societies, definitions, and intended use from MASLD. Drug developers must track precisely which label defines which population across the literature, trial protocols, regulatory submissions, and preclinical model selection.

This article systematically compares NAFLD / MAFLD / MASLD (MASH) / MetALD — the four frameworks — focusing on cardiometabolic criteria and alcohol thresholds. Non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers are covered in the MASLD/MASH biomarker comprehensive guide; this article stays within the classification domain.

1. Why the Nomenclature Overhaul Was Needed

1.1 Three Motivations for Renaming

The 2023 Delphi consensus1 was a multisociety process (AASLD / EASL / ALEH and others) involving 236 experts from 56 countries across four online survey rounds plus two hybrid in-person meetings. Three motivations drove the change:

  1. Eliminating stigma: "Fatty" and "alcoholic" carried moral connotations that reduced screening uptake and treatment adherence. The neutral medical term "steatotic" replaces them.
  2. Pathophysiologic precision: NAFLD was an ambiguous umbrella — "anything not alcoholic." The new term centers metabolic dysfunction (obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension) and distinguishes it from drug-induced or viral etiologies.
  3. Trial endpoint and regulatory alignment: With Resmetirom's FDA accelerated approval (March 2024, Rezdiffra) and accelerating MASH drug pipelines, regulators (FDA/EMA), sponsors, and trial sites needed uniform patient definitions. See MASH combination therapy and M&A 2026 for why industry alignment mattered.

1.2 Timeline

YearEventImpact
1980Ludwig et al. coin "nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)"5NASH concept established
1986NAFLD becomes the umbrella termExclusion-based definition
2020-03Eslam et al. propose MAFLD2Pioneering positive criteria (hepatic steatosis + metabolic dysfunction)
2023-06Delphi consensus: NAFLD→MASLD / NASH→MASH1Requires ≥1 cardiometabolic criterion
2023-05AASLD Practice Guidance (Hepatology)3Last major guidance under the NAFLD label (pre-Delphi)
2024-03FDA grants accelerated approval to Resmetirom labeled "MASH" (Rezdiffra)Regulatory documents shift to the new label
2024-06EASL-EASD-EASO 2024 MASLD CPG (J Hepatol)4First European guideline consolidating MASLD and including MetALD

For researchers tracking fibrosis & inflammation R&D

FDA approval alerts, trial readouts, preclinical model selection, and assay optimization — curated signal for bench-to-pipeline readers. 2 emails/month max.

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy. No spam. Up to 2 emails/month. Unsubscribe in one click.

2. NAFLD / NASH (legacy 1980–2023)

2.1 NAFLD as Exclusion Diagnosis

  • Hepatic steatosis ≥5% (imaging or histology) as the core requirement
  • Exclusions: significant alcohol (male >30 g/day, female >20 g/day), viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, drug-induced liver injury, inherited metabolic disease (e.g., Wilson)
  • NASH: NAFLD with steatohepatitis (steatosis + lobular inflammation + hepatocellular injury/ballooning); NAS ≥4 or Kleiner/Brunt-based diagnosis

2.2 Operational Limitations

  • Fragile "non-" definition: The alcohol threshold (30/20 g/day) was never globally standardized and varied across studies
  • Metabolic dysfunction was implicit: Although most NAFLD patients had obesity/diabetes, the definition only required "not alcoholic"
  • Edge cases: Light drinkers or lean dyslipidemic patients were poorly classified

2.3 Mapping Legacy Literature

Legacy preclinical NASH models (AMLN vs GAN diet, CDAHFD, MCD, etc.) map directly onto MASH in most cases. The phenotype (steatosis + inflammation + fibrosis) is unchanged, so biological validity persists under the new label. For clinical citations, distinguish pre-June 2023 = NASH / post-June 2023 = MASH and use a bracketed note (e.g., "[MASH (formerly NASH)]") at first mention.

3. MAFLD (2020 Eslam Consensus)

3.1 Positive Criteria Design

MAFLD = Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease2. Defined as hepatic steatosis plus at least one of:

  1. Obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m² in non-Asians, ≥23 in Asians, or visceral obesity)
  2. Type 2 diabetes
  3. Evidence of metabolic dysfunction (≥2 of 7 items):
    • Waist circumference ≥102 cm (M) / ≥88 cm (F)
    • BP ≥130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive treatment
    • TG ≥150 mg/dL or treatment
    • HDL-C <40 mg/dL (M) / <50 mg/dL (F) or treatment
    • Pre-diabetes (HbA1c 5.7–6.4%, IFG, or IGT)
    • HOMA-IR ≥2.5
    • hs-CRP >2 mg/L

3.2 Decisive Differences from NAFLD

  • Alcohol co-existence permitted: MAFLD sets no alcohol threshold — MAFLD + HCV or + ALD dual diagnosis is explicitly allowed. This was Eslam's central argument.
  • Dual etiology embraced: Overlap diagnoses such as "MAFLD + alcohol-related liver disease" are intentionally supported.

3.3 Adoption and Controversy

  • Endorsed: Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), parts of Latin America
  • Not adopted: AASLD / EASL (favored MASLD via the Delphi process)
  • Controversy: Some argue MAFLD's alcohol tolerance "creates confusion" and "breaks trial enrollment"; others praise it as "reflecting real-world patients."

Impact on drug development: MAFLD as an inclusion criterion in Phase 2/3 trials is rare. Virtually all current trials use MASLD/MASH. When citing MAFLD-labeled publications, note that "MASLD and MAFLD are not fully equivalent."

4. MASLD / MASH (2023 Delphi Consensus)

4.1 MASLD Diagnostic Criteria

MASLD = Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

All of the following1:

  1. Hepatic steatosis ≥5% (imaging / histology / serum marker combination)
  2. ≥1 of 5 cardiometabolic criteria (below)
  3. Absence of another predominant etiology (significant alcohol, drugs, monogenic disease, etc.)

4.2 Cardiometabolic Criteria (Adult Version, 5 Items)

#ItemThreshold
1BMI / Waist circumferenceBMI ≥25 kg/m² (≥23 for Asians) or WC M >94 cm / F >80 cm (Asian: M >90, F >80)
2Fasting glucose / HbA1c / T2DMFPG ≥100 mg/dL, 2-h OGTT ≥140 mg/dL, HbA1c ≥5.7%, T2DM diagnosis, or treatment
3Blood pressure≥130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive therapy
4Triglycerides≥150 mg/dL or lipid-lowering therapy
5HDL-CM ≤40 mg/dL / F ≤50 mg/dL or lipid-lowering therapy

Pediatric criteria use different thresholds1.

4.3 MASH (Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis)

  • MASLD criteria met plus steatohepatitis (steatosis + lobular inflammation + ballooning)
  • Histologic criteria are identical to legacy NASH. NAS, SAF, and Kleiner/Brunt scoring systems carry over unchanged
  • Fibrosis staging continues to use Kleiner/Brunt (F0–F4) — see METAVIR vs Ishak fibrosis staging for scoring system comparisons

4.4 Practical Differences from Legacy NAFLD

Almost all legacy NAFLD cases (>99% by Delphi estimates) map to MASLD1. Exceptions:

  • Metabolically healthy NAFLD ("lean NAFLD without metabolic risk") with all 5 cardiometabolic criteria negative → not MASLD; classified as "cryptogenic steatotic liver disease"
  • Specific-etiology fatty liver (monogenic disease, drug-induced, etc.) → specific aetiology SLD as a separate category

5. MetALD: MASLD + Moderate Alcohol

5.1 Why the New Category

MASLD-eligible patients who drink moderate to significant amounts of alcohol are clinically common. The legacy "NAFLD vs ALD" binary excluded them. The Delphi consensus created a third category — MetALD1.

5.2 Alcohol Thresholds (2023 Delphi)

CategoryMaleFemale
MASLD<210 g/week (<30 g/day)<140 g/week (<20 g/day)
MetALD210–420 g/week (30–60 g/day)140–350 g/week (20–50 g/day)
ALD predominant>420 g/week (>60 g/day)>350 g/week (>50 g/day)

Pure ethanol basis (1 standard drink ≈ 10–14 g).

5.3 Boundary with ALD

Above the MetALD ceiling (male 420 / female 350 g/week), cases are classified as ALD predominant, though coexisting cardiometabolic criteria allow a dual-label "ALD with metabolic dysfunction." For preclinical work, see ALD vs MASLD models — the choice affects target mechanism studies (metabolic pathways vs alcohol metabolism).

5.4 Divergence from DSM-5 and WHO Drinking Criteria

Delphi thresholds are hepatology-evidence based and do not directly map to DSM-5 AUD or WHO hazardous drinking definitions. Trial protocols evaluating alcohol history must specify protocol-specific thresholds clearly.

6. Four-Framework Quick Reference

AxisNAFLD/NASH (1980–2023)MAFLD (2020 Eslam)MASLD/MASH (2023 Delphi)MetALD (2023 Delphi)
Definition styleExclusion-basedPositive criteriaPositive criteria (cardiometabolic ≥1)MASLD + moderate alcohol
Hepatic steatosis threshold≥5%≥5%≥5%≥5%
Metabolic requirementImplicit (none required)Obesity/DM/metabolic dysfunction (any)≥1 of 5 cardiometabolic criteria≥1 of 5 cardiometabolic criteria
Alcohol toleranceNone (M ≤30/F ≤20 g/day)Unrestricted (coexistence OK)M <30 / F <20 g/dayM 30–60 / F 20–50 g/day
Exclusion requiredMandatoryNot requiredLimited (monogenic, drug-induced)Limited
Endorsing societiesAASLD (through 2023), EASL (through 2023)APASL, part of Latin AmericaAASLD, EASL, ALEH, and othersAASLD, EASL, ALEH
Trial adoptionLegacy trials (majority)LimitedCurrent standard (Resmetirom onward)Emerging, adopted in new trials
FDA/EMA useLegacy guidanceNot adoptedCurrent standardAppearing in regulatory documents

7. Impact on Drug Development, Clinical Trials, and Regulation

7.1 Resmetirom Approval as the Watershed

The FDA accelerated approval of Resmetirom (MAESTRO-NASH trial) on March 14, 2024 started enrollment in 2019 under the "NASH" label, but the approval documentation used "MASH"1. New Phase 3 trials have uniformly adopted MASH terminology since.

7.2 Bridging Ongoing Phase 3 Trials

  • Lanifibranor (Pan-PPAR) NATiV3 trial
  • Efruxifermin (FGF21 analog) HARMONY/SYMMETRY trials
  • Survodutide (GLP-1/GCG dual agonist) MASH trial

Most of these switched terminology mid-trial (NASH → MASH) in reporting and publications without changing the underlying protocol definitions. Datasets transfer directly.

7.3 Preclinical Model Label Mapping

ModelLegacy labelCurrent labelNotes
STAM™ mouseNASH modelMASH modelHistology unchanged
AMLN / GAN dietNASH-inducing dietMASH-inducing dietInduces metabolic dysfunction + steatosis + inflammation + fibrosis
CDAHFDNASH model (limited)MASH-like modelLacks metabolic dysfunction — not a full MASLD surrogate
MCD dietNASH model (traditional)Steatohepatitis model (limited MASH surrogate)Weight loss masks metabolic features

7.4 Continuity of Biomarker Frameworks

Evaluation indices (ECM turnover biomarkers like PRO-C3, FIB-4, ELF, MRI-PDFF, VCTE — see MASLD/MASH biomarker comprehensive guide) transfer from the NAFLD era without cutoff revision.

8. Literature Search and Database Practical Tips

8.1 PubMed

  • Scan both old and new terms: Use OR-union: "MASLD OR NAFLD OR MAFLD"
  • MeSH hierarchy: MASLD is being incorporated into the MeSH tree as a sub-term of NAFLD, with usage as a search keyword expanding. Legacy papers remain reachable via the NAFLD MeSH heading (verify current indexing status in PubMed/MeSH DB as needed)
  • Year filtering: Papers from June 2023 onward predominantly use MASLD/MASH; earlier ones use NAFLD/NASH

8.2 ClinicalTrials.gov

  • Trial name history: Names often differ between registration and current record. Check "Study Record History"
  • Condition field: "MASH," "MASLD," "NAFLD," "NASH" are currently mixed as tags. Search each label and deduplicate

8.3 Internal Reviews and Protocol Drafting

  • First-mention parenthetical: Use "MASH (formerly NASH)" once; abbreviate thereafter
  • Handling MAFLD-labeled papers: Cite as "MAFLD" per the source and footnote "not fully equivalent to MASLD"
  • Prohibited: Do not mix labels within a single document. Pick one nomenclature per protocol

Summary

  • 2023 Delphi consensus renamed NAFLD→MASLD and NASH→MASH and shifted from exclusion-based to cardiometabolic positive-criteria diagnosis
  • MAFLD (2020 Eslam) is a separate framework. APASL adopted it; AASLD and EASL went with MASLD
  • MetALD is a new category: MASLD plus moderate alcohol (M 210–420, F 140–350 g/week)
  • 99% of legacy NAFLD cases translate directly to MASLD. Exceptions: cryptogenic SLD and specific-aetiology SLD

  • Legacy NASH preclinical data and biomarker frameworks carry over to MASH unchanged. Update only the label in protocols and publications

Related Articles

  • MASLD/MASH Biomarker Comprehensive Guide — Details on non-invasive tests (NITs)
  • Liver Antifibrotic Landscape 2026 — Global MASH therapeutic overview
  • MASH Combination Therapy and M&A 2026 — Combination strategies and acquisition plays
  • Resmetirom: First Approved MASH Drug — THR-β agonist clinical development
  • METAVIR vs Ishak: F1–F4 Liver Fibrosis Staging — Biopsy score selection
  • AMLN vs GAN Diet: MASH Model Comparison — Preclinical model selection
  • ALD vs MASLD Models — Mechanistic differences from alcoholic liver disease

References

1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. "A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature." Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1966-1986. (PubMed PMID: 37363821)

2. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. "A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement." Gastroenterology. 2020;158(7):1999-2014.e1. (PubMed PMID: 32044314)

3. Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease." Hepatology. 2023;77(5):1797-1835. (PubMed PMID: 36727674)

4. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). "EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)." Journal of Hepatology. 2024;81(3):492-542. (PubMed PMID: 38851997)

5. Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, Oh BJ. "Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease." Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1980;55(7):434-438. (PubMed PMID: 7382552)

Share:LinkedInX

For researchers tracking fibrosis & inflammation R&D

FDA approval alerts, trial readouts, preclinical model selection, and assay optimization — curated signal for bench-to-pipeline readers. 2 emails/month max.

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy. No spam. Up to 2 emails/month. Unsubscribe in one click.

Stay connected with Fibrosis-Inflammation Lab

Follow our LinkedIn for regular updates on fibrosis & inflammation R&D, or reach out directly for collaboration, study design, and CRO inquiries.

Follow on LinkedInContact us

Related Articles

Education
2026-03-13

ALD vs MASLD Animal Models: Preclinical Comparison

ALD and MASLD share a similar disease spectrum but need distinct animal models. Compare Lieber-DeCarli, NIAAA, and MASH models for your fibrosis research.

Biomarker
2026-05-30

FIB-4 Score Guide: MASLD Cutoffs, Age Limits & ELF 2-Step

FIB-4 = age/AST/ALT/platelet fibrosis index. Age cutoffs (35-65: 1.3/2.67; ≥65: 2.0/2.67), AASLD 2023, EASL 2024 plus ELF 2-step strategy and pitfalls.

Technology
2026-03-12

MASH Mouse Models 2026: GAN vs CDA-HFD vs STAM Comparison

FAQ on choosing the right MASH preclinical model (GAN Diet, CDA-HFD, STAM). Align models with drug Mechanism of Action (MoA) to avoid clinical failures.

Table of Contents
  • Introduction: The Naming Problem in the MASH Era
  • 1. Why the Nomenclature Overhaul Was Needed
  • 1.1 Three Motivations for Renaming
  • 1.2 Timeline
  • 2. NAFLD / NASH (legacy 1980–2023)
  • 2.1 NAFLD as Exclusion Diagnosis
  • 2.2 Operational Limitations
  • 2.3 Mapping Legacy Literature
  • 3. MAFLD (2020 Eslam Consensus)
  • 3.1 Positive Criteria Design
  • 3.2 Decisive Differences from NAFLD
  • 3.3 Adoption and Controversy
  • 4. MASLD / MASH (2023 Delphi Consensus)
  • 4.1 MASLD Diagnostic Criteria
  • 4.2 Cardiometabolic Criteria (Adult Version, 5 Items)
  • 4.3 MASH (Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis)
  • 4.4 Practical Differences from Legacy NAFLD
  • 5. MetALD: MASLD + Moderate Alcohol
  • 5.1 Why the New Category
  • 5.2 Alcohol Thresholds (2023 Delphi)
  • 5.3 Boundary with ALD
  • 5.4 Divergence from DSM-5 and WHO Drinking Criteria
  • 6. Four-Framework Quick Reference
  • 7. Impact on Drug Development, Clinical Trials, and Regulation
  • 7.1 Resmetirom Approval as the Watershed
  • 7.2 Bridging Ongoing Phase 3 Trials
  • 7.3 Preclinical Model Label Mapping
  • 7.4 Continuity of Biomarker Frameworks
  • 8. Literature Search and Database Practical Tips
  • 8.1 PubMed
  • 8.2 ClinicalTrials.gov
  • 8.3 Internal Reviews and Protocol Drafting
  • Summary
  • Related Articles
  • References